You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Using checksums to find corrputed documents in a volume

asked on May 19, 2015

Is there a tool that exists that will crawl the volume and validate the checksums.

In the admin console on a given physical volume you can enable checksums. Then there is a right-click context menu option to “all tasks -> validate checksums”. I believe/hope there exists a tool to crawl the entire logical volume doing the same thing without having to manually validate each of the physical volumes individually.

Is anyone aware of a tool that can do this?

 

Thanks!

0 0

Answer

SELECTED ANSWER
replied on June 1, 2015

The volume consistency checker does not specifically use checksums, it compares general inconsistencies between the volume and the database, such as a file existing in one but not the other. It might also compare the size value. It is more a tool for tracking down missing files, but could serve as a starting point for trying to find corrupted images. 

0 0

Replies

replied on May 21, 2015

I believe Cristobal is referring to the Volume Consistency Checker, which can be accessed from the Support Site. This utility will cross-reference your database with your volumes and make sure there is nothing extra or missing. Check out this post for more information about how the utility behaves.

2 0
replied on May 20, 2015

There is a utility from Laserfiche that is a volume checker. This will check the entries based on sql to the physical locations and create a report. It should also list missing document pages as well as extra files within each volume that you specify. I haven't been able to find it on the support site so you may have to request it from Laserfiche if you cannot find it either.

1 0
replied on May 27, 2015

Thank you both for your responses. The goal is to try and find corrputed images. Is the Volume Consistancy Checker this the best/only way to do this?

0 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.