Question

WebLink search form dynamic fields

WebLink Administration

Updated November 21, 2018

asked on March 17, 2015

Is there a way to populate the values from the dynamic fields of a repository to the fields within a custom search form in WebLink? I'm unable to get the dynamic field values to populate the fields within the search form.

0 0

Answer

SELECTED ANSWER

replied on March 23, 2015 • Show version history

Hello Nathan,

What version of WebLink are you using? There is not a currently a way to use dynamic fields in search forms, however there is template search in the version 9 release. This type of search does support dynamic fields.

0 0

Replies

replied on March 25, 2015

Good Morning Kathryn,

The version of WebLink is 9.0.0.258. Can you give me any info (or a link for more info) and the template search feature in WebLink 9?

Thanks in advance

0 0

replied on November 21, 2018

Hi. Did you have an answer on this? I have the same situation.

Thanks

0 0

replied on March 25, 2015

The template search in WebLink is just like template search within the Client, so dynamic fields will behave in the same way. The only downside to this method of searching is that it is more friendly for users who already know and understand Laserfiche metadata. If this search is meant for non-Laserfiche users, I suggest just making multiple search forms for the different options displayed by dynamic fields.

0 0

replied on May 8, 2017

Is there anything published on configuring the WebLink Search Form Designer to use dynamic fields?

0 0

replied on November 20, 2018

Has there been any progress with this issue? we need to perform searches through dynamic fields, however we have not had success

0 0

replied on March 26, 2015

Thanks Kathryn, I see now how WebLink handles dynamic fields. I'll look into using multiple search forms for accomplishing what is needed for the dynamic field search.

0 0

You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Question

Question

WebLink search form dynamic fields

Answer

Replies

Sign in to reply to this post.