You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Unknown SQL have a performance impact on Laseriche

asked on October 30, 2014

One of our customers is reportedly seeing an instance of the SQL below appearing to be run on their Laserfiche database at a average frequency of once every eight seconds.

(@P1 int,@P2 int)select toc.tocid as id,toc.toc_sdctl,case when toc.toc_flags & 32 = 32 then 1 else 0 end as hasacl,case when toc.parentid is null then 0 else toc.parentid end,case when toc.etype >= 0 then 1 else 0 end from toc join searchresult10 sr on toc.tocid = sr.tocid and (toc.toc_flags & 2048) = 0 and toc.tocid<>2 left outer join toc as linktoc with (nolock) on case when toc.etype = -1 then toc.linkto else toc.tocid end = linktoc.tocid where sr.rsid=@P1          and ((toc.etype=-2 or toc.etype>=0) or (toc.etype = -1 and (linktoc.etype=-2 or linktoc.etype>=0))) and ((toc.toc_flags & 1048576) = 0 or toc.tocid = 1 or not exists (select * from entry_tag et join tag t on et.tag_id = t.tag_id where t.is_secure = 1 and et.tocid <> 1 and et.tocid = toc.tocid and (toc.etype <> -1 or et.tocid = toc.linkto) and not exists (select * from sess_tag st where st.tag_id = et.tag_id and st.sess_id = @P2            ))) order by case when toc.etype>=0 or (toc.etype=-1 and exists (select * from toc l where l.tocid=toc.linkto and l.etype >= 0)) then 1 else 0 end,(select date_val from propval where propval.pos=0 and propval.tocid=linktoc.tocid and propval.prop_id=26)  desc,toc.name desc

 

Our customer has indicated that the above SQL is resource intensive and in that regard is having performance implications on their Laserfiche system. Our customer would like to know what the SQL does, what could be initiating the SQL and what can be done to restrict the SQL from running so often and would also like to understand ways to make the SQL less resource intensive and therefore have less of a performance impact on the system.

1 0

Answer

APPROVED ANSWER
replied on November 13, 2014

This is related to searching and filtering the search results based on security of the user that initiated the search. Are there any automated processes that could be improperly running searches while stuck in a loop, maybe something like an SDK application or improperly configured workflow?

0 0

Replies

You are not allowed to reply in this post.
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.