You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

how to use java in laserfiche workflow

asked on May 26, 2014

 Hi Everybody..I am a java programmer and i want to know is there is any way to use my Java skills in Laserfiche workflow ?

                         

0 0

Replies

replied on May 27, 2014 Show version history

Currently, Workflow only supports custom scripts using C# or Visual Basic. 

 

What exactly is it you are trying to do?

0 0
replied on May 27, 2014 Show version history

I want to perform same task that can be done by

C# or Visual Basic in Laserfiche...

 

0 0
replied on May 28, 2014

It sounds like you want to request the feature of writing custom scripts using Java. I'll forward the request to the Workflow development team.

0 0
replied on May 28, 2014

Why use Java over C# or VB.NET? Is it a simple preference or is there functionality that C# or VB.Net does not offer? If it's just for interacting with Laserfiche, why add another moving part to mix?

0 0
replied on May 28, 2014

Thanks Mike Wu... I really appreciate it...

0 0
replied on May 28, 2014

Why Java :-

 

Excellent tooling: IDE, CI, etc.

Vast array of 3rd party libraries.

Huge amount of documentation available.

Large pool of developers available.

Platform ubiquitous.

Excellent performance.

Excellent specification.

Sturdy garbage collection.

Managed memory.

Native threads.

Choice - implemented by multiple vendors.

 

These are the just some features that i mentioned here...Java is lot more than that...

0 1
replied on May 29, 2014

Right, but all that also applies to .Net and C#. You've mentioned that you only want to use Workflow to interact with Laserfiche, so it not very clear to me what the benefit of adding extra dependencies would be over just using the Laserfiche .Net SDK.

1 1
replied on May 29, 2014

I also would add that the LF SDK Java libraries are not a complete replacement for the LF SDK .Net libraries.

1 2
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.