You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

search performance

asked on May 23, 2014

 Hi, customer is having performance issues with searching . I have referred her to document Improving Laserfiche Search Performance document. She has a question in regards to fuzzy search on page 8.

 

Page 8 - Fuzzy search -  Will removing the attribute and replacing it with another resolve the issue?
- Find partial matches - is there a similar query as with fuzzy search?
- Include shortcuts - same question as fuzzy search.
. Can we do this for partial matches and shortcuts? Can we replace the attribute in the SQL tables (rather than in individually within the admin console?)

 

Thanks, Valerie

0 0

Answer

APPROVED ANSWER
replied on May 23, 2014

Here is a SQL query to see the partial matches attribute:

select * from trustee_attr where attr_name = '[Settings]SearchPartialMatches'
and attr_val like 'Yes'

I do not know if it would be appropriate to replace the attribute in the SQL table directly.

 

As for your first and third questions, I'm not sure I understand what you are asking. Turning off these options improve performance. There is not a separate set of options that have better performance but the same results, otherwise those would be used be default.

 

It is recommended to have Fuzzy search turned off unless you explicitly need to perform a fuzzy search because the more flexible a search is, the more time and resources it takes to complete, and the more "noise" (irrelevant documents) you will have in your results.

 

Similarly, "Resolve Shortcuts" (referred to as "Include Shortcuts in Search Results" in the paper) is not typically necessary but will take up more server resources and slow down searches. Resolve shortcuts is necessary if a user is performing a search where they can see the shortcut but not the document, and they are searching on the document's metadata (such as fields) or text. "Resolve Shortcuts" would be useful, for example, if the repository was set up using Transparent Records Management.

0 0
replied on May 23, 2014 Show version history

Obviously editing attributes directly in SQL is not supported. An SDK application would probably be the best solution since that's how the Admin console does it.

 

That said, I make mass updates to attributes in this way all the time, and it works ok. angel

 

(I'm not endorsing doing this unless you are confident in your SQL-Fu and can divide by zero)

1 0

Replies

You are not allowed to reply in this post.
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.