You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Should I use Dynamic Fields to tie my records retention to Records Management? Or are there other alternatives?

asked on January 22, 2014

I currently have our records management folders set up for our various departments. When creating folders inside of the department records management folders, most often your records types (i.e. FIN113 W-9 Forms) are listed under those department parent folders and retention is set on the record type folders. The record type folders may also contain year folders which inherit the retention of the record type. See attached Screen Shots.

 

My question is: what is the preferred or recommended practice for classifying the individual records to the retention? Are most organizations using dynamic fields, which allows the user to first select their department and then the particular record type? Example: (Template Field: Department): Finance; (Template Field: Record Type): FIN113 W-9 Form. Many retention schedules could have hundreds of record types, and using dynamic fields would narrow the choices for the user by department, otherwise they would have to choose from a very large list of all record types. Alternatively, are any organizations using BIG Buckets, where the user would choose from a list of actual retention times (i.e. 3 years, 7 years, Closed+7, etc.) This would not be the preferred as your relying on your users to know the specific retention of the record. Most if not all of my Laserfiche templates would contain the same dynamic field for Department & Record Type, so no matter what the record or department is, they can be tied to their repsective retention. Having these fields would also help with pushing the records to the proper Rec.Mgmt. folder by TRM workflow.

 

Any thoughts from the Laserfiche Experts and Community would be most appreciated!

RecordsManagementFolderExample.JPG
RecordSeriesProperties.JPG
RetentionDynamicFieldExample.JPG
0 0

Replies

replied on January 22, 2014

I tend to create more templates tailored to very specific business processes, with document types related only to that process. Then use workflow to file away in the appropriate record series. This at least for me keeps the user choices down as you would not necessarily need to plug in all series types to a schedule in one template. I also tend to make my retentions very specific to my series and not use generic timeframes, as in my experience retention schedules can and will change and it is easier to change and keep track of if set up to a specific series. Having said that there are a number of ways to achieve the same end result and the above just seems to work best for me. For example, rather than have a field for department and filter the record type from that, could you have separate templates for departments and add the types for that, such as a Zoning template with file types such as Application, Meeting Summaries, Staff Reports, Determinations. and Approval Letters, which could feed the appropriate series. It keeps user selections simpler and more direct to their process. Just my thoughts and good luck with your setup!

2 0
replied on January 23, 2014

John,

Thanks for sharing, these are great considerations!

0 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.