You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Laserfiche Server-Multi Processors

asked on July 16, 2013 Show version history

Dears,


Since the Public Portal License is related to the number of processors of the Laserfiche Server, and since the performance of the Laserfiche Server depends on the number of cores not processors, and since also the RIO Public Portal license is sold following several options  "for dual CPU machine" or " Multiprocessor machine", we need to know if there is in the market a  Dual CPU machine which can support up to 32  Cores in order to avoid the purchase of the "RIO Public Portal License for multi processor machine".

 

Also, do you recommned this approach (two processors machine-16 cores each, if exist), or you prefer to have a multiprocessor machine-32 cores to support up to 600 concurent connections).

 

Thanks,

Dory

0 0

Replies

replied on July 16, 2013 Show version history

This link:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Xeon_microprocessors#.22Sandy_Bridge-EN.22_.2832_nm.29

 

Shows the current Sandy Bridge Xeon processors available. You could go with a pair of 8 core machines that give you 16 cores/32 threads. There are 10 core machines availble right now too. In september there is a whole new line that can take you up to 12 cores/24 threads!

 

I only posted this because I don't know of any 16 core machines on the market yet. ("hyperthreaded cores" - yes, but actual cores - no).

 

I would think with that many simaltaneous users you would be approaching limits of bandwidth in and out of the server to serve up documents and search results long before you would overun the capabilities of the processor. 

 

 

 

 

1 0
replied on November 6, 2013

I think in this case, the question was meant with 32 cores, that being logical cores, and not the actual physical cores (32 threads, XX amount of cores). This would need to be accomplished with a dual CPU system.

1 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.