You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Digital Signatures

asked on May 6, 2013 Show version history

A customer has asked: “Why would I want to purchase a certificate from a Trusted Root Authority rather than using a self-signed certificate for LF Digital Signatures?”

I believe he is looking for the implication of choosing one over the other.  Can you give any insight to this?

 

0 0

Answer

APPROVED ANSWER
replied on May 6, 2013 Show version history

I think there may be a little confusion here.  Your options are really: a) Use a Certification Authority, or b) Use Windows Server Certificate Services.  Self-signed certificates would be difficult to implement and insecure, so I wouldn’t recommend that.  As for whether it’s better to go with a Certification Authority or do things internally…  That’s up to you.  Unless you’ve got a good reason to go with a Certification Authority, I’d definitely recommend just using Certificate Services.  It’s free, secure, and easy to roll out.  If you go with something like Verisign, you’ll need to pay for the certificate, and do some extra configuration to set things up.  The benefit is that your certificate is issued by a universally recognized authority, but that’s probably not a big deal unless it’s required by some industry standard your client is required to follow.

 

0 0

Replies

You are not allowed to reply in this post.
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.