You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Decide on What to Call WebLink/Portal

asked on September 4

Throughout the years Laserfiche WebLink has been referred to as WebLink, Portal, Public Portal, etc. This is evident by the name of the product vs application log folder vs installation folder. With version 12 of WebLink still being worked on, would it be possible to clean up the name that is used in these different places to use a single name?

2 0

Replies

replied on September 4

I realize this probably seems a bit more confusing externally, but from my perspective it's best to think about the use case of the item. We have a software module called 'Laserfiche WebLink' (and that's why all internal components like virtual directories and such say WebLink) that handles a couple different use cases. One of those use cases is specifically licensed as 'Public Portal', and covers external public anonymous read-only access. That was initially a specific license module, and in self-hosted, you can use (the application) Laserfiche WebLink either through that Public Portal licensing model, or without it. 

As Laserfiche Cloud only supports the Public Portal use case/model, it inherited just that aspect of the name. 

So basically, in all cases WebLink is the 'application, or piece of software', that has a specifically licensed use case called 'Public Portal'. In Laserfiche Cloud we use 'Public Portal' as the external module name since that's the use case offered there. 

1 0
replied on September 4

There is an exception to that. The Event Viewer log node is named Portal. Seems odd to name that Portal from an Admin perspective.

0 0
replied on September 4 Show version history

Man, you just had to go and ruin my impeccable internal logic attempt, didn't you. wink

(I agree that doesn't sound correct, probably a miss in the naming for that internally). 

2 0
replied on September 5

So can that be updated in v12? smiley

0 0
replied on September 5

Sure, making sure the logic of the names is present is something we could look at when we have a chance to get to WebLink 12. We're not sure where exactly that fits though, just now. 

0 0
replied on September 4

I agree that the naming should be consistent one way or the other once it goes to version 12. I personally prefer the WebLink name.

0 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.