You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Laserfiche deployment on AWS  as IAAS

asked on July 1, 2019

I need a solution architecture guide or design for Laserfiche deployment on AWS  as IAAS.

0 0

Answer

SELECTED ANSWER
replied on July 5, 2019 Show version history

Hi Mohammed,

Here's a general diagram I use as a guideline. Your actual number of servers and how you split up Laserfiche components among them will depend on the system's size, user count, and use case.

For example, if your solution doesn't use Quick Fields Agent or Import Agent, you don't need the "Capture Server". If your solution is especially Forms-heavy, you may want a dedicated Forms Server. Etc.

 

4 0

Replies

replied on July 1, 2019

Hi Mohammed,

Can you make your request any more specific? Deploying Laserfiche on AWS IaaS is similar to deploying it on-prem. You still have Windows Server VMs, file storage, and SQL Server databases.

Generally speaking, you'll have the following:

  • EC2 instances running Windows Server 2016 or 2019
    • Use M5 (General Purpose) instances for Laserfiche Server
    • Use M5 or C5 (Compute Optimized) instances for Web applications, Workflow, and Quick Fields (Agent)
    • T3 Burstable instances are appropriate for Dev/Test environments
  • EBS volumes (gp2 or st1) for repository storage
    • Laserfiche repositories cannot directly use Object storage like S3
    • EBS backup snapshots do use S3
  • AWS RDS for MSSQL instance(s) for the databases
    • Note that you'll need to pre-create empty app databases in RDS first - some Laserfiche DB setup wizards will fail to create a new database on RDS but can populate an empty, existing DB just fine
    • M5 or R5 (Memory Optimized) instances
    • T series if you only need SQL Express for a small system
3 0
replied on July 2, 2019

Thanks for your reply, I think this information is good enough, however, I do not have an experience in such implementation, do you have any diagram sample that shows how to place all mentioned component in one architecture diagram? 

0 0
SELECTED ANSWER
replied on July 5, 2019 Show version history

Hi Mohammed,

Here's a general diagram I use as a guideline. Your actual number of servers and how you split up Laserfiche components among them will depend on the system's size, user count, and use case.

For example, if your solution doesn't use Quick Fields Agent or Import Agent, you don't need the "Capture Server". If your solution is especially Forms-heavy, you may want a dedicated Forms Server. Etc.

 

4 0
replied on July 7, 2019

Dear Samuel,

 

thanks for your reply, highly Appreciated :)

 

Now, I have a clear vision

 

 

0 0
replied on March 6, 2020

Dear Samuel,

 

What about load balancing for Laserfiche web applications (forms, web, weblink),  do we have to use AWS application or network balancing and why?

0 0
replied on March 6, 2020 Show version history

NLBs have a much simpler form of sticky sessions (source IP affinity) than ALBs, which are cookie-based.

You should go with ALBs. That also allows you to use path-based routing to have one hostname for those Laserfiche web applications (e.g. lf.company.com). In addition to being simpler for end users, it can help avoid CORS issues in your solution.

NLBs do not support path-based routing, so you need an NLB per backend server with separate application roles. For example, if you have two Forms servers and two Web Client servers, you'll need two different endpoints (e.g. docs.company.com, forms.company.com), each of which requires a separate NLB.

ALBs also allow you to use Web Application Firewall (WAF), an incredibly useful security tool for anything public-facing.

Important NoteIntegrated Windows Authentication (IWA, the "Windows Authentication" button) does not work correctly through an ALB (layer 7, HTTP) as it is a layer 4 TCP-level protocol. Doing so presents a security risk as users' authentication tokens can get crossed. It is important to ensure that LFDSSTS login pages are either behind an NLB (layer 4, TCP) or not behind load balancer at all.

2 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.