You are viewing limited content. For full access, please sign in.

Question

Question

Laserfiche Client VS. Laserfiche Web Access with Web Access Accelator

asked on October 1, 2014

Hi,

If we are talking about performance and response time, which option is faster while opening an image document within Laserfiche:

 

- Laserfiche Client 

- Laserfiche Web Access with Web Access Accelator

 

Thx,

Lana

 

0 0

Answer

APPROVED ANSWER
replied on October 2, 2014

In most situations, Web Access is not going to be faster or more responsive than the Windows client.  The thick client has the advantage of talking directly to the Laserfiche server.  Given how the applications work, one scenario where Web Access might have an advantage is low bandwidth and low processing power on the client machine.  If you add in Web Accelerator, Web Access also benefits when there are image cache hits (i.e. different users looking at the same pages).

But in general, you aren't choosing one solution over the other because it's the fastest.  You are choosing one over the other for a variety of deployment or integration reasons, and then making sure it's fast enough.  Both applications should be fast enough.

0 0

Replies

replied on March 17, 2015 Show version history

I'm looking into a similar issue. I have a client with remote offices. I may recommend Web Access, however they do have a Terminal Server that we could load the client on which may work just as effectively, if not better, and more than likely save them money in the end. Any recommendations for a situation like this?

0 0
You are not allowed to follow up in this post.

Sign in to reply to this post.